REVIEW: Griff the Invisible

7 Apr

Saw this one the other night, a slight and only slightly enjoyable offering from first-time feature director Leon Ford.

Ryan Kwanten (the zero body-fat human prawn from True Blood, Red Hill) plays Griff, a quirky, lonely loser who moonlights as a not-very-good superhero.  When his brother brings round an equally quirky girl who takes a shine to Griff, his life changes and his skewed reality is challenged.

Featuring a decent performance from Kwanten, who is usually idiotically hilarious in True Blood, as the mousy Griff, this film was pretty junior-burger stuff.  It looked like it was filmed on 16mm with very few visual flourishes outside of its colour palette.  As I was watching it I was constantly reminded of the films of Yahoo Serious (not a compliment), but without the halfway decent music.  The film played out all those shitty short films you see over and over again at local festivals, shot at a friend’s place or a partner’s office, using semi-pro actors mugging at the camera like it’s their only chance to be seen.

The script was flabby and lacking in any relevance outside of the screen, which is fine for highly entertaining films, but not for rom-coms which do best when they play to general themes of love and the importance of individuality.  This film is really only relevant to the highly moronic and deluded…which is to say that maybe it could find its audience if it screened at churches around the nation.

Basically, if you have seen Amelie, Benny & Joon and Young Einstein then you have already seen this story done much better and I have to agree with the website blurb;

GRIFF THE INVISIBLE [] will (dis)appear in cinemas nationally March, 2011

http://www.grifftheinvisible.com/

4/10

That looks popular, I’m in!

7 Apr

An interesting piece of marketing has cropped up recently.

Fox’s animated film Rio, from the creators of Ice Age (1-∞) is doing a tie-in with Angry Birds, the first Appzilla tie-in that I can think of.  This isn’t just creating a mini-game for your film, this is hooking up with the biggest app on the planet to make a 3rd version of their massively successful game that is tailored to your film.  What a coup for Fox.  The app is $1.19 (AUD), so 99c in the US and the gameplay is similar to the main two Angry Birds games (Original and Seasons), the only difference being that you knock down cages to free captive birds, rather than annihilate evil egg-stealing pigs.  There is also a free version, with 6 levels (the paid one has 60) to draw people in just like Angry Birds Lite.

The interesting thing here is the Cui Bono factor, Who Benefits?  Are Angry Birds (Rovio) trying to establish a cinema presence ahead of the film they have in development.  Have Fox realised that most movie tie-in games get played once and then deleted, or, if they are paid Apps, played three times, not deleted and then looked at with hatred and disdain forever because of their extreme level of crappiness.  (Yes, I bought King Kong for XBOX 360.  Yes, it sucked balls.)

Another thing worth noting is the trailers that both companies have produced.  Rather than make one trailer that promotes both products, they have done two separate things.  Rovio have made an Angry Birds RIO trailer (which shows none of the gameplay, a bad decision) while FOX have done a “mashup”, inserting the Angry Birds into the scene from the film that inspired the gameplay of the new game.

Slasher Films

1 Apr

Janet Leigh in "Psycho" (1960)

So, I’m sitting here watching Bob Clark’s “Black Christmas” (the one from 1974, not the shitty remake), and I’ve realised we’re probably going to review “Scream 4″ in the near future (fuck, was “Scream” really 15 years ago? Damn…), so heck, why not give you a brief run through of some of the best (well, in my self-exaggerated opinion) of the horror subgenre has to offer.

This is by no means a complete list of influencial slasher flicks, nor is it aiming to cover all flicks that have influenced or built conventions for the subgenre. Further, I’ve ignored many great films because I feel that while they can be considered slasher films, they primarily belong in different subgenres.

Let’s begin.

1960: Psycho (Alfred Hitchcock)

The proto-slasher from the master of tension, Psycho brought conventions such as the first girl (ie: the person you think is the protagonist, but dies before the halfway mark) as well as brutally violent deaths (for it’s time), but it also brought the concept of the damaged child, a trend you can see evident in the sequels to Sean S. Cunningham’s “Friday the 13th”. Sure, the blood in the shower is Hershey’s Chocolate Syrup, but it doesn’t look any less real in black and white.

1974: Black Christmas (Bob Clark)

Ever seen five of those 80s VHS slasher flicks? Ever seen John Carpenter’s Halloween? Yeah, thank Bob Clark. If Porky’s was the first time you ever saw boobies, now you owe him double.

1978: Halloween (John Carpenter)

Speaking of Halloween, while it’s a film that utilised many concepts seen previously, it is also deftly directed and, while slow to start, you can see why it became an iconic horror film – because it’s execution far excells it’s source material.

1980: Friday the 13th (Sean S. Cunningham)

While Black Christmas and Halloween spawned a subgenre, Friday the 13th spawned a franchise. Important distinction. Paramount was embarassed at the film (and it’s sequels) for it’s success, but the almighty dollar rules all. Watch the first four, part six, and skip the rest. Except for when Jason Voorhees crosses Freddy Krueger…

1984: A Nightmare on Elm Street (Wes Craven)

A quality flick that’s a cut above (hah!) the slasher fare. Once again, as with Friday the 13th, it has spawned a load of sequels (see parts 1, 3, 4, and New Nightmare – although number 2 is a bizarrely homoerotic flick, worth watching for the supporting performances alone, and Freddy’s Dead is probably worth a watch if you’re a truly hardcore 1980s John Waters fan).

1996: Scream (Wes Craven)

Redefined the slasher film after annual installments of Friday the 13th and A Nightmare on Elm Street. Made every horror film in the following five years have an ironic or self-aware tone. But you know what? It’s still got a star dying early in the film (ref: Psycho), it’s still got the reveal of the crazy killer (ref: Friday the 13th), and quite frankly, it’s still a fucking great film. Just be thankful that Party of Five is no longer on the air, and weap for the loss of Jamie Kennedy’s dignity.

If you’re still stuck on what to watch before Scream 4 besides the previous sequels, try a triple bill of A Nightmare on Elm Street, Shocker, and New Nightmare. You’ll see the development of ideas from a writer/director. What better way to prep yourself for Wes Craven’s return to one of his most successful films?

Rango

28 Mar

PREVUE OF COMING ATTRACTIONS

FEATURE PRESENTATION

(more…)

Adjustment Bureau

18 Mar

PREVUE OF COMING ATTRACTIONS

FEATURE PRESENTATION

(more…)

Podcast: I Am Number Four

11 Mar

“I can’t imagine this is going to be good” – Adrian McFarlane

PREVUE OF COMING ATTRACTIONS

FEATURE PRESENTATION

(more…)